Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
The Beyond Skyrim Wiki — Hosted by UESP
(→UESP) |
(talk page etiquette (restoring good faith message) and reply) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ==UESP== | ||
+ | I'm not sure I understand the purpose of creating a separate site for this project when we have a perfectly good [http://en.uesp.net/wiki/Tes5Mod:Mods Tes5Mod] namespace. We've seen real success with documenting mods in the past, such as with [http://en.uesp.net/wiki/Tes3Mod:Tamriel_Rebuilt Tamriel Rebuilt]. It seems to me like this would only damage UESP by removing content and editors from the main wiki. [[User:Legoless|Legoless]] ([[User talk:Legoless|talk]]) 12:37, 2 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
+ | :Just to note that the concerns here have been discussed on the UESP's Administrator Noticeboard and in private. In short, while the UESP administration may have concerns over some editors coming here to add content, this wiki is run by the BS team, and neither of us can dictate where editors go to add the content they have. Meanwhile, I will still be attempting to promote a good working relationship between both the BS wiki and the UESP wiki, in the hopes that we can work constructively together. --[[User:Enodoc|Enodoc]] ([[User talk:Enodoc|talk]]) 20:23, 2 July 2017 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 19:24, 2 July 2017
UESP[edit]
I'm not sure I understand the purpose of creating a separate site for this project when we have a perfectly good Tes5Mod namespace. We've seen real success with documenting mods in the past, such as with Tamriel Rebuilt. It seems to me like this would only damage UESP by removing content and editors from the main wiki. Legoless (talk) 12:37, 2 July 2017 (EDT)
- Just to note that the concerns here have been discussed on the UESP's Administrator Noticeboard and in private. In short, while the UESP administration may have concerns over some editors coming here to add content, this wiki is run by the BS team, and neither of us can dictate where editors go to add the content they have. Meanwhile, I will still be attempting to promote a good working relationship between both the BS wiki and the UESP wiki, in the hopes that we can work constructively together. --Enodoc (talk) 20:23, 2 July 2017 (EDT)